Florida Community
College at Jacksonville
Faculty Senate
Minutes
December 2, 2004
|
Members Attending |
Absent |
|
President: Wayne Bailey
Vice President: Debbie Reynolds
Secretary: Reta Roberts |
|
|
Deerwood Center:
Jeff Olma |
|
|
Downtown Campus:
John Debo
Catherine Rifkin |
John Lucy
Noel McKeon
Michael Orender |
|
Kent Campus:
Tessie Bond
Jenny Ohayon
Jim Stittsworth |
Steve DiFranco
|
|
North Campus:
Myra Jowers
Patty Lee
Marcie Fisher |
Barbara Barbin
|
|
South Campus:
Peggy Bald
Toni Grant Bryant
Gena Casas
Steve Milczanowski
Jean Shepard |
Heather Dore
|
Open Discussion
There were no visitors for open discussion. Refreshments
were served and everyone visited and enjoyed great conversation.
__________________________________________________________________________
Meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. by President Wayne
Bailey.
CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION (Bond/Ohayon):
Accept Minutes of November 4, 2004 Faculty Senate Meeting.
Discussion: None
Action: Motion Passed (Attachment
A)
By-laws Amendment
Results – Secretary Roberts reported
the results of the By-laws voting as provided by Supervisor of Elections, Marsha
Davison:
|
Campus |
Yes |
No |
Abstention |
Total |
|
Deerwood |
10 |
1 |
0 |
11 |
|
Downtown |
11 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
|
Kent |
12 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
|
North |
11 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
|
South |
37 |
2 |
0 |
39 |
|
TOTAL |
81 |
3 |
0 |
84 |
MOTION (Bond/Reynolds): We
ratify the By-Laws as Amended and Voted by Faculty
Discussion: None
Action: Motion Passed
Syllabus Committee
Report (from Sirius Project
discussion) – Senators Casas and Bond reported as follows:
- Spring 2003 was the
first meeting where the concept of unified syllabi was brought to the
senate.
- Ideas approved by the
senate at that time had separate syllabi content than those for the
on-campus classes.
- There are no records
of the senate for this period of time
- The concepts agreed to
by the senate (the two checklists; one for on-line and one for on-campus)
are not part of the APM’s.
- No one knows which is
being used by the dean’s to approve current syllabi.
- Idea is to review each
checklist and bring ideas back to the next senate meeting after constituency
has had time to review it. Then we can develop a list of what the senate
agrees with, what we disagree with, and then take it back to faculty again
to come up with a final document.
- Senate agreed to the
following being in the General Syllabus:
- Course Title
- Course Number
- Instructor
- Contact
Information for instructor
- Office and
office hours
- Phone number
- E-mail address
- Description of
Course (extracted from Official Course Outline)
- College
prerequisites for the course
- Instructional
Materials – Texts and other resources (may include information for
ordering on-line)
- Instructor
Expectations – may include classroom management items
- Policy on
electronic devices (If applicable)
- Attendance policy
to include information on NA, FN (IW and W for Adult Studies)
- Withdrawal date
for the class
- Assessment
measures to include Tests and assignments and make-up policy
- Grading criteria
to include grading scale, incomplete policy (if used by instructor), and
homework policy (if applicable)
- College Honor Code
– may reference page in College Catalog or weblink
- Topical Course
Outline – should include topics to be covered or specific competencies
and may include tentative test dates and assignment due dates
President Bailey motioned
to table this discussion till later.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
FN Policy
– President Bailey asked for input on the FN grade ideas because this issue is
being discussed at the FEOV meeting next week. Discussion:
- Who defines what
constitutes “non-attendance”? Should it be up to the college to define
this or is it up to each faculty member?
- The FN is about
financial aid, yet we have students that are not on financial aid so what
does it mean? What is the FN really? Is it only for those on financial
aid?
- Want to keep the FN so
can distinguish between the student who academically failed and those who
just did not put forth the effort.
- Is it financially
feasible for FCCJ to limit the number of FN’s? Are we trying to limit the
number of FN’s?
- FN was sold to faculty
to replace the IW and now is all of this being changed? What about the idea
of the IW? Why can’t the FN be tied only to financial aid students and let
faculty use the IW for others?
- Is it appropriate for
this description for the FN to mean that the FN is no longer appropriate for
the student who has attended so much that they failed, even though they did
show up for the last few classes?
- These ideas are to go
to FEOV for the next meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 4:35 p.m.